Please use this simple online form to ask your local candidates for their support.
You can also print the list of pledges to give to your local candidates.
Rethink Rebuild Society • Syrian Association of Yorkshire • Syria Solidarity UK • Kurds House • Syrian Community of the South West • Syrian Platform for Peace • Scotland4Syria • Syrian Welsh Society • Help 4Syria UK • Peace and Justice for Syria • Syria Society of Nottinghamshire
For more information contact email@example.com
An election manifesto on Syria
The Syrian conflict is still ongoing after more than six years. We have witnessed the gassing of children; the deliberate targeting of hospitals, schools, markets, and bakeries; the starvation sieges of civilian communities; the forced displacement of entire towns; and the drowning of refugees at sea.
If elected MP, I pledge to:
1. Affirm the democratic right of Syrians to choose their own future free from dictatorship and terror.
2. Call for the UK to track and publish details of military aircraft flights by the Assad regime and Russia that may be responsible for unlawful attacks on civilians.
3. Call for drone aid airdrops to besieged civilians to provide immediate relief and add pressure for full ground access.
4. Call for the UK to help enforce an end to attacks against civilian targets by the Assad regime and its allies.
5. Call for widened sanctions against the Assad regime and its supporters for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
6. Call for the UK to pursue all avenues to bring perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity to justice, including through universal jurisdiction as well as international legal mechanisms.
7. Call for the UK to pursue a ‘Uniting for Peace’ vote in the UN General assembly recommending action to protect civilians.
8. Demand the highest standards of accountability of all our Coalition partners for air strikes taking place in Syria.
Why are we calling for these pledges?
- The Syrian crisis began with ordinary Syrians calling for civil rights and political reform. Their protests were met with gunfire, mass arrests, torture and killing by the Assad regime.
Syrian refugees fear to return as long as the regime remains in power.
The Assad regime has a history of promoting terrorist groups, including Iranian and Hezbollah militias, and now uses them against its own civilians. This is why only democratic political reform can end the Syrian crisis.
- The UK has the technology to track Syrian and Russian aircraft carrying out attacks in violation of UN resolutions, ceasefires, or international humanitarian law. We can publish radar data on attacks, as the US did for the regime’s 4 April 2017 chemical attack, so that perpetrators can be identified and sanctioned.
- The UK along with other countries promised a year ago to airdrop aid to besieged civilians, but then broke that promise. Since then thousands more Syrians have been forced from their homes. Unmanned drone systems are capable of dropping food and medical aid.
- The US retaliation in response to the 4 April 2017 chemical attack shows that it is possible to deter the Assad regime and its allies. Non-chemical attacks are still killing many more civilians, and yet we fail to act.
Force should be used if necessary and against carefully targeted military installations of the Assad regime. Any use of force should be for the sole purpose of civilian protection, should be proportional, and should comply with international humanitarian law.
- Sanctions should be widened by sanctioning officers of regime military allies implicated in war crimes; by designating militias implicated in systematic attacks against civilians as terrorist organisations; and by sanctioning companies such as Iranian airlines used to supply the regime with arms.
- The UN General Assembly has established a body to prepare prosecutions. That body needs to be supported and means to try cases need to be established.
EU Resolution 2016/2933 called on members to ‘take all necessary measures to hold alleged perpetrators to account, including through universal jurisdiction.’
Tens of thousands have been tortured and killed in Assad’s prisons. Hundreds of thousands of civilians are believed still detained, including thousands of women and children. Releasing detainees and opening detention centres to inspection are essential measures before any political negotiation can advance.
- Russian vetoes in the Security Council have paralysed international action. A Uniting for Peace vote can recommend legal and legitimate international action through the UN General Assembly where Russia has no veto.
- Civilian deaths from Coalition bombing have escalated drastically since December 2016, but the Coalition has only a few staff investigating casualties. The UK is co-responsible for Coalition actions and their consequences and must demand the highest standards of accountability for the entire Coalition.
Some star MPs on Syria
… it is time to draw a red line on the indiscriminate aerial bombardment of Syrian civilians by the Assad regime. I believe the best proposal to achieve this is the creation of a limited ‘no bombing zone’ which could be enforced by US, French and UK naval assets already in the region.
Jo Cox MP, Labour, 12 October 2015
We must insist that Syrians driven from their homes and terrified are protected. Access for humanitarian agencies to all areas is essential. The international community is guilty of a grotesque lack of action. The authority of the UN is being flouted and grossly undermined by this paralysis and failure.
Andrew Mitchell, Conservative, writing with Clare Short, 1 February 2016
No expense has been spared in dropping UK high-tech missiles on the country, but it is bread, not bombs, that the people in Syria need, and it is incumbent on us to do all we can to make sure that they get it. May I ask the Minister why eight days have passed since the UN deadline, with no tangible action? Are we really asking for permission from Assad to feed the very people he has starved?
Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh, SNP, 9 June 2016
Why can powers not marshal the capacity and resolve to supply the means of life, given that we have shown that we can deploy the means of death?
Mark Durkan, SDLP, 9 June 2016
I join my right hon. Friend in supporting no-bombing zones, as well as aid drops in memory of our former colleague and my Yorkshire neighbour, Jo Cox.
Jason McCartney, Conservative, 11 October 2016
We talk about non-intervention, but Syria has had intervention from Russia, from Hezbollah and from the Iranians.
Alistair Burt, Conservative, 11 October 2016
The international community should and could institute a no-fly zone for Syrian helicopters. It is Syrian helicopters that drop the illegal barrel bombs full of napalm, chemical weapons and high explosives. It is estimated that such a no-fly zone could reduce civilian deaths by roughly 90%.
Ann Clwyd, Labour, 11 October 2016
My sense . . . is that a no-bombing zone could work. We could say that every time the Assad regime and Russia committed one of these atrocities in the full of view of the international community, the coalition that is currently fighting Daesh would respond, primarily with naval assets, by targeting part of the regime’s infrastructure. No one would be bombing Russia or taking down Russian planes, but we would target that infrastructure every time they committed an atrocity.
John Woodcock, Labour, 11 October 2016
Ultimately, we must be ready to build support for multilateral military action to undercut the ability of Putin’ proxy Assad to wage war on his own citizens.
Andrew Mitchell, Conservative, 18 October 2016
The Minister asks whether there is a safer way to deliver aid, yet he knows that the Syrian regime has bombed the latest humanitarian convoy which went to the city in September. He knows that there will be no political solution while Assad and Putin think they can win the upper hand through military activity. The residents of Aleppo do not want to die and it is in our power to help them—if not now, when?
Mary Creagh, Labour, 28 November 2016
While Assad has brutally torn Syria apart, the UK government has failed to provide even a minimum protection to the civilians stuck there, nor those who have fled.
Tom Brake, Liberal Democrats, 13 December 2017
All humanity is ‘our own’ and we have a responsibility and a duty to act. We are not so poor as a nation, financially or morally, that we should turn our backs on what we see on distant shores, not least because it will eventually find its way to us, whether in the form of terror on our own streets or refugee families seeking sanctuary in our estates.
Anna Turley, Labour, 13 December 2017
If we as a nation will not take action, the UN will not take action and all the most powerful nations in the world will not take action, what hope did those people have and what hope do they have today?
Craig Whittaker, Conservative, 13 December 2017
I believe humanitarian airdrops should begin immediately, and should be carried out by drones or GPS-guided parachutes.
Caroline Lucas, Green Party, 13 December 2017
… surely the Government must finally accept that we have reached the point of last resort—that point at which the previous Foreign Secretary promised that airdrops would be used.
Emily Thornberry, Labour, 13 December 2016
We are deceiving ourselves in this Parliament if we believe that we have no responsibility for what has happened in Syria.
George Osbourne, Conservative, 13 December 2016
Firstly, the Prime Minister should come to the House of Commons and present a strategy to protect civilian life in Syria. This means getting aid out of the UN warehouses in the region, and by opening up humanitarian corridors, or creating safe zones, or using airdrops, getting this aid effectively delivered—especially vital medical supplies. It means working out how to stop the bombing, using no-fly or no-bombing zones.
Alison McGovern, Labour, 10 April 2017